The use, arrest, and incarceration rates for marijuana use between whites and people of color have been shown to be disproportionately higher for people of color.

1. Use rates: Studies have shown that marijuana use rates are similar across different racial and ethnic groups, with slightly higher rates among whites.

2. Arrest rates: Despite similar use rates, people of color are disproportionately more likely to be arrested for marijuana possession. According to data from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), black people are nearly four times more likely to be arrested for marijuana possession than white people, despite similar usage rates.

3. Incarceration rates: People of color are also disproportionately more likely to be incarcerated for marijuana offenses. In states where marijuana is illegal, black people are disproportionately represented in the prison population for drug offenses, and they are more likely to be sentenced to prison for drug offenses than white people.

These disparities in arrest and incarceration rates are believed to be a result of systemic racial bias in the criminal justice system, as well as discriminatory policing practices. For example, studies have shown that black and Latino communities are disproportionately targeted by police for drug enforcement, and that they are more likely to be searched, arrested, and incarcerated for marijuana offenses than white people.

These disparities in arrest and incarceration rates have led to calls for the legalization and decriminalization of marijuana, as a way to address racial disparities in the criminal justice system and to promote social justice. However, it's important to note that these policies alone may not be sufficient to address the systemic racial bias in the criminal justice system and more comprehensive reforms are needed.

Cannabis can be legal at a state level but not at a national level in the United States because the U.S. Constitution grants states the power to make their own laws and regulations. Under the 10th Amendment, states have the right to regulate "police powers," which include issues such as public health and safety.

As a result, states have the ability to legalize or decriminalize marijuana possession and use, while it remains illegal under federal law. This creates a conflict between state and federal law, and creates a legal gray area.

The federal government has not yet repealed the laws that prohibit marijuana use, possession, and distribution. The Controlled Substances Act (CSA) of 1970 lists marijuana as a Schedule I drug, which means it is considered to have a high potential for abuse and no currently accepted medical use. This makes it illegal to grow, possess, or distribute marijuana under federal law.

However, in 2013, the Obama Administration issued the Cole Memorandum, which instructed federal prosecutors not to prioritize the enforcement of federal marijuana laws in states that had legalized marijuana. This policy has been rescinded by the Trump Administration, but under the Biden Administration, it's not clear yet the stance towards the state legalized cannabis.

This means that while states can legalize marijuana, it remains illegal under federal law and this creates legal uncertainty for growers, sellers, and users, and also limits access to banking and other financial services.

Thank you for your question.  Yes, I think they will continue with business as normal regardless of Mr. Sessions departure.  In my opinion, it doesn't matter who the AG was or will be, the DEA, DOJ, IRS, and FDA all continue to work together towards keeping cannabis out of small business.